179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Greg Eden
To:
Date:
Fri, 07 Feb 1997 16:19:27 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) underground v mainstream
Msg-Id:
<3303547d.23681375@sygnet.syspace.co.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<32FB4B91.458E@individual.com>
Mbox:
idm.9702.gz
On Fri, 07 Feb 1997 10:34:41 -0500, you wrote:
quoted 9 lines I didn't say that they do, or that they should so. their music defines>> I didn't say that they do, or that they should so. their music defines >> their market. orbital and chem bros etc are beginning to let their >> market define their music... a dangerous path. > >Dunno about Chem Bros., but I think you're making a mistake about >Orbital. The music on _In_Sides_, to my ears, isn't any more (or >less) likely to be played on the radio than "Chime" and "Halcyon," say. >Heck, you could even consider "The Box" to be an extension of "Belfast" >or "Are We Here?"
nah. it's miles *less* likely to be played. insides is the large flaw in my orbital = pop arguement as it's very much un-pop. g.