179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
William L Samuels
To:
Nick Yoder
Cc:
Y'all
Date:
Fri, 28 Jun 1996 17:54:55 -0700 (MST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Recent Comps.
Msg-Id:
<Pine.A32.3.91.960628174236.83548D-100000@kitts.u.arizona.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<199606281723.KAA14006@taz.hyperreal.com>
Mbox:
idm.9606.gz
On Fri, 28 Jun 1996, Nick Yoder wrote:
quoted 7 lines finally: to the bozo who went after Urb: that's pathetic. if you disagree with> finally: to the bozo who went after Urb: that's pathetic. if you disagree with > Ms. Palmer about the Chemical Brothers, fine. i think you can say that without > getting so personal or bringing Urb into it. As an added bonus, you'll sound le > ss like an idiot. Finally, if you're going to reply so earnestly about your > heroes, at least get the facts straight: i haven't been paying attention to > techno records for long, and i know they've been around at *least* two and > a half years.
Well sir, I am sorry that I can't stoop to your level by calling people names. I posted an oppostion to Ms. Palmer's review, correct. And I did criticize URB for being behind it their news. It was a common event to read a review about something that came out 1 year ago or more. It was a criticism, because nearly everything I read was OLD news. I read MUZIK mag and IDM, and find them to be valuable resources. I did refer to URB as being the one Decent American magazine, but it pales compared to Muzik. I expressed that I wish URB would catch up. I am glad that there is at LEAST one American Magazine, that covers this genre. I don't really want to retype everything that I already responded to. So I will leave it at that