179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Mark Kolmar
To:
Deckard
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 25 Jun 1996 13:03:11 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: Mike & Aphex release...
Msg-Id:
<Pine.PTX.3.93.960625124732.7043A-100000@ccs1.ccs.nslsilus.org>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.A32.3.91.960624153045.43907A-100000@orion.it.luc.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9606.gz
You can't just keep on doing what you did. May as well pack it in at that point. With few exceptions, an artist's output becomes less and less inspired unless they develop significantly. One thing I admire about RDJ is his willingness to wander in different directions, seemingly guided only by his own whim. If anything, I would sincerely suggest he stretch further and take more time on each track. I was quite disappointed with the HAB records. Sounded like hastily-executed bandwagon-jumping, and that's not a good sign from someone generally regarded as something of a pioneer. --Mark -- "We invented machines in order to reduce our work. Now that we have them, we think we should go on working." -- John Cage On Mon, 24 Jun 1996, Deckard wrote:
quoted 2 lines but twin just seems like the type that should have just continued on at> but twin just seems like the type that should have just continued on at > what he was good at...