179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Lazlo Nibble
To:
Intelligent Dance Music
Date:
Fri, 8 Mar 1996 09:45:42 -0700 (MST)
Subject:
(idm) mix tapes (was the infamous The whole AFX bootleg issue...)
Msg-Id:
<199603081645.JAA23834@kitsune.swcp.com>
Mbox:
idm.9603.gz
quoted 7 lines If you hold the copyright one a work, you also have the right to>> If you hold the copyright one a work, you also have the right to >> control any works that are derived from your original work. This is a >> very well-established aspect of copyright law. > > ok. but is it fair/correct...? I understand an artist's interest in > preventing outright *duplication* of his work without his permission, > with no changes made to it... but derivated works!?!
Yes, derived works. I don't have a major moral problem with that; why should someone be able to sample a killer hook from some #1 pop song without permission and then make all kinds of money on the cheesy bubblegum-techno wankfest they hang off it? Seems to me that the people responsible for the success of something like that -- i.e., the guys who wrote that hook in the first place -- ought to have a say in the matter...
quoted 4 lines (its possible i missed some details on the legal dispute, but none that> (its possible i missed some details on the legal dispute, but none that > would change my overall point. if my shady memory halfway serves, > another example was microsoft being sued for utilizing (not copying!) > the mac "look"...the case was denied.
The legal thinking behind these decisions is that you can't copyright the layout of controls for a piece of software any more than you can copyright the layout of buttons on the front panel of a VCR; the creative component necessary for copyright isn't there.
quoted 6 lines Yes. If a work is performed in public, the artist has the right to demand>> Yes. If a work is performed in public, the artist has the right to demand >> royalties. That includes live DJ gigs. > > ok. again thanks for clarifying. but if a work is mixed up with other > works, say four layers on top of one another, who is being creative at > that point...?
Adding your own creative contribution to a work doesn't remove your obligation to the people who made the tools you used. If you use someone else's creative work as part of your creative work, then that someone else should get their fair credit for it. -- ::: Lazlo (lazlo@swcp.com; http://www.swcp.com/lazlo)