179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Mark Kolmar
To:
Che
Cc:
,
Date:
Sat, 6 May 1995 11:32:52 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: Antacid is ph neutral...h neutral...
Msg-Id:
<Pine.PTX.3.91.950506112324.9800D-100000@ccs.nslsilus.org>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.BSD.3.91.950506035031.23638B-100000@synthcom.com>
Mbox:
idm.9505.gz
First off, let me say I have not heard "Antacid" so I make no comment on that particular track. However... It occurs to me that the very title "Antacid" may be telling. So is acid something that cannot be done without a 303? Or is the 303 merely the fave instrument for making acid tracks? I dig a lot of acid music (mostly UR's acid though), but even assuming they use a 303 the sound to me was never so much about the -303- as much as that bubbling, squeaking, etc., sweeping filters, tweaking, and obtuse lines. Obviously the 303 is extremely well-suited to this, but other instruments can generate this stuff as well, albeit not exactly as the 303 does. Someone even said the true workhorse of Detriot is the Prophet 5 I think. On Sat, 6 May 1995, Che wrote:
quoted 8 lines While the flamethrower's out, I'd like to point out how "Antacid" is> While the flamethrower's out, I'd like to point out how "Antacid" is > utterly ruined by that damn 303 SAMPLE. I'm sorry, but the sound of the > filters on Messrs. Pritchard & Middleton's sampler opening and closing is > a poor substitute for a real 303. > > To think, this could have been one of the all time great acid tracks. > Instead, I'm already getting tired of it because it doesn't have > that...SQELCH.