From my experiance, 4X burning with disc-at-once has not given me any
problems. I have burned 4 or 5 discs using this method and they all have
worked fine in my CD-Rom drive as well as my various CD players at home (my
stereo and my discman). I don't know if it has to do with bad CDs, bad
writers, or what but I have had no problems using the 4X, disc-at-once
method with my el cheapo Maxell CD-Rs and an HP 8100 CD-RW. And personally
I hate the 2-second interval between tracks...but that's just me.
Ryan
quoted 22 lines Just my 2cv...
>Just my 2cv...
>
>They're probably burning the CDs at 4-speed, disk-at-once, and although
>disk-at-once is supposed to be red-book audio standard, they invariably
>f--k up. And if disk-at-once wasn't bad enough, 4-speed writing is even
>worse.
>
>If they burned the CDs at 2-speed, they'd probably save about a month per
>CD. :-)
>
>For the record, the CDs I've burned at 2-speed, with a normal close-session
>(2-second gap at the end of each track - not disk-at-once) have played on
>everything I've tried them on - a handheld CD-player, 2 CD-ROM drives, a
>13-year old CD-player, and I've even lent a few CDs out, and no-one has had
>any trouble playing 'em.
>
>So CDuctive's main concept isn't flawed - successfully-burned CD-R's are
>one of the most reliable things I've used - but their execution is poor.
>
>Jeremy.
>
>