179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Auction/New Autechre

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-04-23 18:33Andregurov Re: (idm) Auction/New Autechre
1998-04-23 20:06Steve81778 Re: (idm) Auction/New Autechre
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-04-23 18:33AndregurovIn a message dated 98-04-23 09:40:06 EDT, tom.tonger@uni-koeln.de writes: << the market wi
From:
Andregurov
To:
,
Date:
Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:33:48 EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Auction/New Autechre
permalink · <7056147e.353f898e@aol.com>
In a message dated 98-04-23 09:40:06 EDT, tom.tonger@uni-koeln.de writes: << the market will show if $70 really is "too much" for the disc. >> supply + demand = invisible hand But there was no reason for you to include your diatribe on the "extreme" imposed upon two "equal" parties by socialism. James PS- the "Party" does not like to be flamed in print. Now to the IDM content and away from the Auction Action - Any news as to when the new Autechre is to come out? I read the post from yesterday - could that be the domestic release of "Chiastic Slide" on Nothing or is it really a new album? Inquiring minds insatiably search ...
1998-04-23 20:06Steve81778I don't really think his post was a diatribe, it was two words long. just a point that he
From:
Steve81778
To:
Date:
Thu, 23 Apr 1998 16:06:42 EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Auction/New Autechre
permalink · <bb2cb194.353f9f54@aol.com>
I don't really think his post was a diatribe, it was two words long. just a point that he can sell it for whatever someone will pay for it. and who are we to put the buyer down for buying and the seller down for selling? (well, we know who we are to do that, but...) I diatribe would be him calling us all socialists and ranting for a page or two about how wrong we all are... I think everyone needs to chill out and stop worrying about other people's business interactions (sorry if that comes off as a diatribe) steve (who will apologize if he finds there was a post that he missed that did include a diatribe on socialism) << But there was no reason for you to include your diatribe on the "extreme" imposed upon two "equal" parties by socialism. >>