179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) NYC: Aphex Live Review

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-09-04 16:18Christopher Fahey (idm) NYC: Aphex Live Review
1997-09-05 23:12Re: (idm) NYC: Aphex Live Review
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-09-04 16:18Christopher FaheyOkay, as per tradition, I review the realy big show! CMJ Opening night at Roseland in NYC,
From:
Christopher Fahey
To:
'IDM'
Date:
Thu, 4 Sep 1997 12:18:00 -0400
Subject:
(idm) NYC: Aphex Live Review
permalink · <01BCB92C.9838CC50.chrisfahey@mindspring.com>
Okay, as per tradition, I review the realy big show! CMJ Opening night at Roseland in NYC, Spet.3 1997 The space/crowd: Huge space. Thousands of people. There was a VIP stage off to the side. Maralyn Manson was there (left after the sneaker pimps - are the pimps the only electronic act they know about because of their "collaboration" on the spawn soundtrack?) and so were Smashing Pumpkins (spying on the cool kids so they could steal a new style). There were only 1 or two people with glow in the dark cylume sticks in the whole crowd. Indeed, the crowd seemed quite old and dull (most of them were CMJ badgeholders and industry wonks), yet there were also frequent pockets of raver kids and dancing machines (like me). Luke Vibert: Missed it. Oh well. Fluke: Missed it. Oh well DJs Ken Ishii and Luke Slater: Played in between acts. Didn't notice them really. Nice backspins and scratches occasionally, but who knows who was who. Who cares. Sneaker Pimps: I got in for the last two songs. I saw two guitarists, a drummer, a keyboardist, and of course the vocalist. Although I respect their efforts, I was never all that crazy about the Pimps before, and what little I saw of them didn't change that. I think they made a big tactical error by deciding to go with a live guitar act. Maybe they thought they could ape My Bloody Valentine or Lush or something, but none of the musicians was skilled enough on their instruments to compare to those two bands (both of whom I've seen live and both of whose live shows are amazing). The singer seemed flat to the point of monotone - maybe she's not comfortable singing on stage? And worse of all the volume was WAY too low. Daft Punk: Whoa! This was fun. Started me dancin right off the bat. They played all their favorites to a very receptive crowd (the crowd cheered when the familiar riffs came on). My friends think otherwise, but it seemed to me that they were constantly fiddling with some drum machines and analog effects - their songs changed tempo and the effects were flying everywhere. It was cool and they did a good job of maintaining a vibe. Can anyone tell me if they had a DAT at all, or was it all analog equipment and sequencers? But again, the volume was WAY too low. Death in Vegas: Another couple of blokes with guitars, a DJ, and a keyboard guy. If the sneaker pimps had this kind of lineup (and these guys' skills) then they would have been set. And these guys could use a vocalist, but that's just me. Anyway, they were really good. They basically alternated between guitary wa wa wankery (very much a la MBV and Lush and quite good) and hip hop beats. They actually didn't mix/overlap those two elements throughout - they would usually alternate playing rock guitar, then switching to beats/turntables/keyboards. When they did mix the two, they did it so carefully (excellent mixing) and smoothly that they *thankfully* avoided sounding like that whole hip-hop-rock scene (311 or even the beasties these days). Nice sound, nice texture, nice beats, not to crazy about the overall song structures - sounded like they were playing loops live. On the pet peeve tip: You know, I was crazy about all that Mo'Wax and Ninja Tune stuff about a year ago, but now I'm not sure anymore. I mean, most of that music now sounds like it's just loops. They are usually very nice loops, but the songs lack structure or a sense of beginning and end. I found them good to listen to while writing, like listening to hip hop without lyrics. But now that I have spent some time listening to the records alone, they feel barren. Of course, not all of it. But you all know the dominant vibe I'm talking about. Anyway, I've decided to not be satisfied by 3 minute songs of just loops even if they are really really nice loops. Death in vegas was louder than the first few bands, but still not nearly loud enough. Crystal Method: I guess these guys are kind of the headliners. An emcee came out and announced that the crystal method had arrived. Smoke machines flooded the joint (uh-oh, I said) then the light show went crazy. And, for the first time in the night, the mix people turned up the volume to a proper dancing/trancing level. I think there was a promoter conspiracy at the show that stipulated that the headliners get louder mixes than the opening acts. Anyone agree? They really got the crowd moving, but I found their music dull and formulaic. I danced a LOT though, but I attribute that to 1)the volume 2)the lights and 3)crystal method's genuine skill at playing club scenes and maintaining a lowbrow vibe. #3 is a skill which bands like Daft Punk and Panasonic lack and which most IDM folks don't appreciate anyway. See Aphex review below for my (positive) opinion on this. Aphex Twin: Loudest of all! HE was sitting on a little platform in front of a couch with headphones on and some equipment around him. I really have no idea what kind of equipment though, so you tech wankers can look elsewhere for fetishistic rdj idolatry. It was LOUD and Bleepy and hard as nails. He emptied the wax out of my ears. It's still dripping today. I loved it. Occasionally he would hit a groove and everyone would be dancing to the beat, but as per rdj style, he would kill it as soon as it started. I don't think anyone's used to that kind of groove-taunting yet, but I kinda like it. Obviously it's a VERY different concept than Crystal Methods traditional house ideology: Keep em dancing or they will leave. It's refreshing to hear someone drop such beats and yet throw so many dance traditions to the wind. RDJ says "fuck the groove thing" and I listened. I fucked the groove thing. After the second song, the RDJ Gummi Bears came out. Two six foot tall furry teddy bears came out and danced and fucked and wrestled to his tunes. One was green, one was orange, but both had RDJ's face. I hope he split the check 3 ways with those two guys, cuz for the parts where the groove was being discombobulated there wasn't much to do besides watch the bears. Must've been hot in those suits. Hardest working bears in show biz. As a true multimedia hound and as a disciple of the philosophy that artistic virtuosity is just plain wankerism, I think that go-go bears are *absolutely* appropriate to a musical concert and it's perfectly okay for me to include *their* hard work in my overall assessment of rdj's show. As an artist in the 90's, RDJ should be judged by everything he does, not just his music. Without the bears, I think the show might have gotten a B+. With them, a full A++. Bravo Dickie J! -CF
1997-09-05 23:12KaisrSolze@aol.com>Must've been hot in those suits. Hardest working bears in show biz. Near the end of his s
From:
To:
Date:
Fri, 5 Sep 1997 19:12:44 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) NYC: Aphex Live Review
permalink · <970905191125_-1199462560@emout16.mail.aol.com>
quoted 1 line Must've been hot in those suits. Hardest working bears in show biz.>Must've been hot in those suits. Hardest working bears in show biz.
Near the end of his set, one of the bears staggered to the back of the stage and the guy in the suit was pulled out of it, pretty easily visible from the audience. Must have been hot. And I think it was fine that RDJ went for the goofy twisted stage show (the couch, very few lights, giant neon bears dancing/wrestling/ getting vaguely sexual with each other). Much more intersting than the big budget smoke and lights of the Crystal Maggots. Scare the damn ravers, sez I. Sam