179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

(idm) Re: idm V1 #1108

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-06-01 17:10(idm) Re: idm V1 #1108
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-06-01 17:10suture@juno.com>Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 18:06:53 -0400 >From: Alex Reynolds <polygon@jhu.edu> >Subject: (i
From:
To:
Date:
Sun, 01 Jun 1997 13:10:07 EDT
Subject:
(idm) Re: idm V1 #1108
permalink · <19970601.131129.9134.0.suture@juno.com>
quoted 15 lines Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 18:06:53 -0400>Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 18:06:53 -0400 >From: Alex Reynolds <polygon@jhu.edu> >Subject: (idm) Re: DAT purchase > >I have a friend in the sound engineer business, who warns to stay away >from Sony DAT equipment at all costs. Apparently, they use a >propietary >head angle setting which allows you to record on their stuff, but you >can't playback on any other brand DAT player -- other companies using >an >industry standard head setting. > >Anyone who is in the biz directly, on this list, who would care to >comment >further?
i've heard of this problem as well . i believe it was someone at a local music store (audio light & musical) that was telling me this when i was interested in a sony dat machine . needless to say, i still love alesis