179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Micro-genres

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-12-15 02:24(idm) Micro-genres
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-12-15 02:24VeeHead@aol.comAbout two years ago, a review in Wired magazine and the subsequent purchase of Aphex Twin'
From:
To:
, , ,
Date:
Sat, 14 Dec 1996 21:24:01 -0500
Subject:
(idm) Micro-genres
permalink · <961214212401_235472843@emout14.mail.aol.com>
About two years ago, a review in Wired magazine and the subsequent purchase of Aphex Twin's _SAW II_ started to make me aware of a burgeoning area of music that was to become very interesting to me. I came to this new stuff after many years of listening to a lot of music that was "different": ambient (the Eno variety), space rock, minimalism, contemporary classical, avant-garde and experimental, and I found a lot of linkage between those types of music and this new type: a thing called "ambient" or "ambient-techno". I did a little searching around, bought some more music, lurked on some Usenet newgroups and gradually learned a little more about this genre and other kinds of music that it seemed connected to. I joined the Ambient mailing list and asked for suggestions for other things to buy, and got, along with a few snide comments, a lot of interesting pointers, which lead me to other groups and more music: Orbital, The Orb, FSOL, Loop Guru, Muslimgauze, Global Communications, The Grid, Banco de Gaia, Higher Intelligence Agency, Underworld, Autechre, Woob and many other artists, along with a lot of compilations. Now all this stuff seems very connected to me, despite the obvious differences between, say, The Grid and Muslimgauze. It is all what we might call, for the sake of discussion, "popular electronic music", and for my convenience I kept the CDs clustered together in my collection (much as I cluster my largish collection of African LPs). As I listened to more music, and read more reviews and comments, I began to realize the people used a lot of different names for this music and I, in my newbie-ness, asked for an explanation in a couple of places. Unfortunately, this only made the problem more obscure, because different people defined the same genre in different ways and the same groups (sometimes even the same *albums*) were named as exemplars of different musical styles. I did get some technical answers about rhythmic structure, beats-per-minute and typical instrumentation, but these were *so* precise in their delineations as to be almost unfathomable except to those complete immersed in their particular musical sub-culture. So, lacking a clear explanation, I began to collect the names of these micro-genres as I came across them on alt.rave, alt.music.techno, rec.music.ambient, the IDM, Ambient, Space and Trance mailing lists, and in the occasional magazine article or book. The list grew and grew, to quite ridiculous lengths, until it seemed to me that every increase in tempo, every variation in kick drum pattern and every choice of sampling material seemed to generate a new description which was to be afforded status as a bona fide "genre". It was this list (slightly edited) which I posted to the Ambient, IDM and Space lists, in the guise of a request from a newbie "friend" for information. I had hoped to make the point that I had made earlier, when I posted a quote from Douglas Coupland about "Musical Hairsplitting" - that the attempt to divide music that was so similar in many ways into a multitude of micro-genres was, well, just a bit silly. It is, after all, the music itself that counts, and not what it is called. (Athough the idea of musical genre as sub-cultural identifier makes some sense, at least sociologically, if not musically.) Now I admit that cross-posting to three lists was perhaps not the best decision (and the space list was probably the least appropriate of the three) but I still believe that there's so much overlap between space and ambient, and ambient and idm, and idm and trance, and so on and so on that it's really counter-productive to try to hold to extremely specific definitions - especially if doing so has the effect of cutting off interesting conversation, or of limiting the musical experience. I do see the value of attempting to keep discussions relatively on-topic, so as to guard against topic-drift, but that really shouldn't prevent some discussion of related subjects. To those who were irked by my list, or by the discussion provoked by it, I apologize. It was not my aim to piss anyone off - I merely hoped both to make a small point about how music gets divided up, and to gather some more impressions about this particular genre from people more informed than I. Ed Fitzgerald P.S. To the friendly fellow on the space list who cheerfully backhanded me because I post from an AOL account: on behalf of all of us here (how many? thousands? millions?), quite a few of us *not* idiots, I thank you. Can you say "prejudice"? I knew you could!