179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) CD

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-10-26 05:43(idm) CD
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-10-26 05:43Pixel8ion@aol.comIn a message dated 96-10-23 22:35:14 EDT, you write: << And as someone else on the list me
From:
To:
Date:
Sat, 26 Oct 1996 01:43:15 -0400
Subject:
(idm) CD
permalink · <961026014312_1415137085@emout05.mail.aol.com>
In a message dated 96-10-23 22:35:14 EDT, you write: << And as someone else on the list mentioned a bit back (g3?), DVD will allow for a minimum of 2+ hrs. of music (96 kHz), or ~5 hrs. at present fidelity specs. Does this mean that people will come to expect even more out of artists? I dunno, I'd rather have my albums short and sweet rather than long with a bit of filler and overlengthy tunes. (Of course if RDJ wants to come out with a 80 min. LP of *strong* material I wouldn't complain either...) >> Actually I would rather have the higher sound fidelity. Are they going to put and an end the the old exposed CD design? The Mini-disc design is fatastic, it's small and it comes in it's own cartridge (too bad the sound isn't very good). Yes like many of you I have scratched the shit out of some really good discs. *grumble...* Eric