179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

(idm) Re: idm V1 #779

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-10-18 16:05Cathryn Siegal (idm) Re: idm V1 #779
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-10-18 16:05Cathryn SiegalIn message <199610171637.JAA09038@taz.hyperreal.com> writes: > > > On a related tip: I've
From:
Cathryn Siegal
To:
Date:
Fri, 18 Oct 1996 16:05:10 +0000
Subject:
(idm) Re: idm V1 #779
permalink · <1366467786-6343447@lserver.math.csuohio.edu>
In message <199610171637.JAA09038@taz.hyperreal.com> writes:
quoted 8 lines On a related tip: I've been told that pressing at 33 or 45 has a different> > > On a related tip: I've been told that pressing at 33 or 45 has a different > > effect on the volume, one (which one?) is louder than the other. Is this > > true and what is the explanation? > > I'm not sure it does. I hear at the loudest pressing at 45rpm you can > fit about 8 mins per side, dunno about 33rpm. >
not an expert myself, but i've been told that the more information is pressed into a record the quieter it is. and i think at 33 more info can be stored, but i think it depends more on that than the actual rpm. i also understand that 7" are by nature quieter as well. of course, i'm just spitting out what was told to me, so i don't really understand why this is the case or even if it is the case. ciao, and Graham, if you should run into a fella called Capper, giv'im our love.ta.