179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Jelly Tones / Theory of Silent Phase / Transmat / Bunch!

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1995-11-16 16:36CiM Re: (idm) Jelly Tones / Theory of Silent Phase / Transmat / Bunch!
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1995-11-16 16:36CiMAt 15:51 16/11/95 +0100, Peel Seamus wrote: >IMHO it's pretty weak.. just as the Silent Ph
From:
CiM
To:
Peel Seamus , , ,
Date:
Thu, 16 Nov 1995 16:36:15 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Jelly Tones / Theory of Silent Phase / Transmat / Bunch!
permalink · <9511161636.AA09330@cpca6.uea.ac.uk>
At 15:51 16/11/95 +0100, Peel Seamus wrote:
quoted 2 lines IMHO it's pretty weak.. just as the Silent Phase album is..>IMHO it's pretty weak.. just as the Silent Phase album is.. >It is too much of too plastic techno..
Which one: _Relics_ or _Jelly Tones_?
quoted 6 lines Think Transmat should have stopped in 1990. Just after the release of The>Think Transmat should have stopped in 1990. Just after the release of The >Beginning. After that they (he was) were with Beltram indirectly responsible >to the bunch of craps which came out since then.. I mean Energy Flash and >Der Klang are not bad but they just _are not_ Transmat.. Just as the >Fragiles aren't the fragiles anymore.. I can't believe you would try to >say >they newest are as good as the BFC, Fade II Black and the Reese one..
Uh, where did I say that? I don't quite follow you Peel - I was just talking about the new Ishii. (Have to agree that _Energy Flash_ wasn't your typical Transmat release, though) || [CiM] || s.walley@uea.ac.uk || http://www.sys.uea.ac.uk/~u9323899/