179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Mantrakid
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:57:38 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] question
Msg-Id:
<43396BF2.2060405@neferiu.com>
In-Reply-To:
<50D95407CDCDF78647A8F473@lang-pc34.arts.bris.ac.uk>
Mbox:
idm.0509.gz
Nicely put. Thanks! Alan Lockett wrote:
quoted 80 lines --On 27 September 2005 08:19 -0600 mantrakid <mantrakid@neferiu.com>> > --On 27 September 2005 08:19 -0600 mantrakid <mantrakid@neferiu.com> > wrote: > >> The result transcends genre, it establishes musical individualism, >> and it >> has existed in all forms from bach to the beatles to nirvana and beyond. >> (self)Genre classification is for lazy musicians who lack the self >> esteem >> and courage to express themselves in their purest form. They assume that >> the only way to connect with the masses is to include themselves with >> the >> masses. > > > I'm not sure there have been many musicians willingly > 'self-classifying' themselves as 'IDM'. > It's a tag that was devised as a kind of critical 'shorthand' to > enable classification, and it stuck, regrettably, though very few > practitioners adopt it in anything other than a 'knowing' kind of way, > as if it had quotation marks around it, so to speak. > Anyway, leaving judgments as to the term's appropriacy (and aesthetic > considerations) aside, 'genre' operates simply as a form of > classification, and though classification is often characterised (as > here) as somehow detrimental, leading to neglect of individual > elements that distinguish one from another, it's actually a very basic > human tendency. At the most basic level, we do it in order to make > sense of the complexity of sensory input we have to deal with daily; > it says that item X is similar in several significant respects to Y > and Z, though different enough to be X. Where it becomes problematic > is when the aspect of difference is diminished or obscured (which is > where an element of wilful deployment comes in). For example, its > social psychological by-products are things like 'stereotyping', which > can be used for evil and wicked purposes, of course, but there is > nothing about the act of genre-fication *per se* that is to be abhorred. > >> Genre exists to restrain thinking to normality and mass >> association. I personally would much rather be referred to as >> 'mantrakid' >> than a techno hiphop artist. > > > Hmmm. I don't think genre 'exists' to do this. Genre is used to signal > to recipients of a message what category something might be said to > fit into, so as to enable a rough and ready processing of the message > (that is not to say it is considered the whole story). > It may be *deployed* by some for the purposes mentioned above > admittedly, but I don't think there's anything pre-wired into genre > that disposes it to 'restrain' individuality (i.e. it's a container, > but not a prison); things can be situated at a different level/order > at one and the same time depending on what system or sub-system they > enter into, being part of a smaller or larger group of similar things. > To make an analogy, I'm aware that a pink grapefruit is, at one and > the same time, a type of *fruit*, a type of *citrus fruit* at that, > and what's more a type of *grapefruit*. Acknowledging its status as > 'fruit' doesn't diminish its essential pink-grapefruitiness, nor does > rejoicing in the particular individual sweet tartness of a particular > specimen require it to be placed apart from the universe of other > fruits and fruitiness in general. > Being referred to as 'a techno hiphop artist' doesn't of itself deny > the individuality of 'mantrakid' any more than calling a pink > grapefruit a fruit restrains its status as a grapefruit, and a pink > one at that, and, what's more, an especially sweet one ... > > urgh... my head hurts now... my mum told me not to mess with ontology... > > Now off to listen to some Elevator Shitcore Ether-Gospel > > alan > > ---------------------- > Alan Lockett (Senior Language Co-ordinator - EFL) > Language Centre, University of Bristol, > 30-32 Tyndall's Park Road, Bristol, BS8 1PY, UK > tel: +44 (0)117 3310914 e-mail: Alan.R.Lockett@bristol.ac.uk > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org