179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Chris Fahey
To:
'john dunning' , Chris Fahey ,
Date:
Wed, 18 Apr 2001 18:31:03 -0400
Subject:
RE: [idm] I just watched pollack
Msg-Id:
<E2CFD53D5E32B641B3188E66256CC68C47C7CF@NYC3MSG01.int.raremedium.com>
Mbox:
idm.0104.gz
quoted 6 lines maybe you didn't catch one of the main themes in the movie,> maybe you didn't catch one of the main themes in the movie, > that pollock > did his best work while sober after he married lee krasner > and they moved > out of NYC to long island, it was only after the nuemann film that he > started drinking again, and subsequently his work/life went to shit.
Oh, believe me I noticed that. Even when he was sober, though, the film never portrayed him saying anything intelligent or coherent about his art. Or about art at all. Conniving, opportunistic, and smarmy critics around him deliberately created the critical opportunity for him, particularly Clement Greenberg. The film, like almost all art biographies, simultaneously glamourizes the artist-as-tortured-soul while lamenting what might have been without all the drugs/alcohol/temper/whatever. We were supposed to beleive he was a revolutionary genius - while at the same time the movie portrayed his artistic endeavors like they came solely from his random and (literally) flailing attempt to get attention. (Is that what the avante-garde is?) He looked about as comfortable talking about art theory as George W Bush does talking about foreign policy. The scene where he discovers the splatter technique is supposed to be like we're watching the birth of Christ, but to me it just ended up saying that "Abstract Expressionism is the product of the careerist desperation of a small group of desperate, shallow, and for the most part alcoholic men." I wish the movie showed his relationship with Thomas Hart Benton. That would have been interesting. Maybe the movie was *trying* to be an indictment of Pollock, AbEx, and the art world... but I doubt it. Either way, it ended up making the single most influential art movement of the late 20th century look like a joke. Which of course it is. By the way, I had a fling with the woman who played the Life magazine interviewer. So I guess I'm biased! -Cf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org