quoted 6 lines From: tom <tomagotchi@lineone.net>
>From: tom <tomagotchi@lineone.net>
>Subject: Re: [idm] warp party vs. idm-list
>
>yeah.. and you'd be even more disappointed if you had to wait an hour and a
>half for some ridiculous security check (put in place purely to massage the
>ego of the label organising the party,
AFAIK, the venue owns the security equipment so it was available to be used
- it was not put in place externally.
Also, AFAIK, it was used at the request of a number of the artists playing
who didn't want their sets recorded. Sure, I'm guessing Warp probably aren't
keen on people taping the shows but they are not acting over the heads of
their artists. In the same way, the third Warp 10 party was not netcast and
archived like the other two because it was requested by the artists that it
not be.
|| [CiM]
|| cim@headspacerecordings.co.uk
|| cim@defocusrecords.co.uk
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org