179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
martin
To:
Date:
Wed, 8 Sep 1999 08:58:09 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) RE: (dim) transform multiply
Msg-Id:
<0373.990908@advent-comm.co.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<005d01bef9cb$8956d880$402fc22b@broadcast>
Mbox:
idm.9909.gz
MB> i would say that the emu 'transform multiply' process is more comparable MB> with that of a vocoder, although none of the results really sound like your MB> traditional vocoder sounds. MB> as far as the effect being used before goes, 'transform multiply' was MB> certainly a function available in the emax II, which surfaced around 88 (?) MB> [can't remember if it was in the emax I or the emulator II?], so it's fairly MB> likely that it has been used before! but, surely the point is, if it sounds good then use it... it doesnt matter who has done what before... just go 4 yourz... its not like people are going to stop using resonant filters just cos theyve been used so much...