179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
ChairCrusher
To:
blipvert
Cc:
henrik str0mberg , indie digital music
Date:
Wed, 7 Jul 1999 20:40:57 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) oldschool timestretching?
Msg-Id:
<Pine.HPP.3.96.990707204021.2623B-100000@arthur.avalon.net>
In-Reply-To:
<3783EF87.7FA5EB8C@arkansas.net>
Mbox:
idm.9907.gz
Actually, all but the very best algorithms will be pretty stuttery -- Sound Forge will sound like this if you push it. kent williams -- kent@avalon.net On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, blipvert wrote:
quoted 26 lines This is actually a stuttering trick that uis performed by chopping the sample> This is actually a stuttering trick that uis performed by chopping the sample > into several segments and sequencing or triggering the sample segments in > a quantized pattern. Try lowering the sampling resolution and triggering > triplets. Think of the way you would chop up and re-trigger a break and > aply it to vocals. > > henrik str0mberg wrote: > > > something that's been prying on my mind... > > > > when jungle was new and exiting (circa 1994) there was a lot of "staccato" > > timestretching going on, i.e. "g-g-g-a-a-a-ng-ng-ng-s-s-s-t-t-t-a-a-a" (shy > > fx & gunsmoke), i suppose due to bad timestretching software. > > how does one go about getting that effect today? are there any > > plug-ins to peak or cubase vst that'll do it? i use a macintosh. > > > > while i'm asking, which would be the best app to convert mp3->aiff with? > > peak 2.0? soundapp 2.61? are there any differences? > > > > hs > > > > _____________________________ > > what we are, we choose to be. > > >