179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Zenon M. Feszczak
To:
Date:
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 15:17:14 -0400
Subject:
RE: (idm) RE: reynolds rant (long and rambly) (avant garde)
Msg-Id:
<v04020a00b337f5eb2b57@dialin0515.upenn.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<000601be8501$6f901e50$02c8a8c0@everton>
Mbox:
idm.9904.gz
Hello -
quoted 5 lines sorry for contributing to my own thread, but i've heard this one before. it> sorry for contributing to my own thread, but i've heard this one before. it > gets used all the time in the rock vs electronica debate. having all those > computers and synths and particularly drum machines, makes it really easy to > make music as opposed to having to learn to play drums or guitar like real > musicians do.
...or to pay for session musicians!
quoted 4 lines and of course punk rock was all shouting, which is really easy> and of course punk rock was all shouting, which is really easy > to do not like singing. and none of them could play their guitars properly > unlike jimmy page and eric clapton who were very good at it indeed. rap is > just talking and people playing records, and so on.
There might be something to those criticisms - except that the initial adherents of punk and rap would not necessarily see those as criticisms per se. As I recall, the early punk aesthetic very much promoted the music as a forum in which technique and theory were irrelevant: anyone who had something to say was welcome. (Well, that lasted about one year). The content - often explicitly socio-political - was the key, not music technique. Of course, the story is not so simple. There is certainly musically sophisticated punk and post-punk (Gang of Four, anyone?) and rap (MC Solaar! Sorry). 3