179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Dave Colbran
To:
Date:
Wed, 20 May 1998 12:00:33 +0000
Subject:
Re: (idm) Autechre / Copyright infringement - remixes
Msg-Id:
<9805201059.AA17418@CSDAlpha1.sbu.ac.uk>
Mbox:
idm.9805.gz
David Hodgson <dhodgson@microsoft.com> wrote;
quoted 5 lines remixers generally just get money up front to do the remix - no>remixers generally just get money up front to do the remix - no >points and no copyright - the copyright stays with the original >author of the track - that's why its a remix - in which case Warp >probably don't have the rights to any of the Autechre remixes, and >neither do autechre
last week in the uk, some sort of legal precedent was set when a small time remixer successfully sued Kylie Minogue's record label over the use of a sample. the guy in question, sorry forgotten his name, used a drum pattern only in a remix that he had done and was justifiably upset to discover it on the lastest kylie single. therefore acting for their artists, warp could in the uk anyway, claim a form of copyright over subsequent remixes, above and beyond the original author's claims however whether this has influenced their recent action is anybodys guess Dave Colbran - Rumblefish Soundsystem http://www.sbu.ac.uk/~colbrad/RUMBLE.HTM