179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
chris r graves
To:
Date:
Thu, 2 Oct 1997 19:01:16 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) Acoustic vs. Electronic
Msg-Id:
<19971002.191355.14366.3.grav@juno.com>
Mbox:
idm.9710.gz
Anthony Ewers typed:
quoted 1 line Consider this, Electronic instruments encourage music which is>Consider this, Electronic instruments encourage music which is
ultimately
quoted 2 lines guided by numbers and specifications whereas those who play acoustic>guided by numbers and specifications whereas those who play acoustic >instrumnts play music guided by the mind & soul.
careful how you say things... this implies that electronic music is _not_ guided by the mind & soul. which is untrue! machines do not program themselves, there is a mind behind the music :) i know what you meant, a sequencer only has so many points at which you can enter a note... but the artists using the sequencer can have much more mind & soul guiding them than say a rock guitarist who has memorized some notes. perhaps sequencing is just a really good form of memorization that doesn't depend on the human mind, or something ;)
quoted 3 lines electronic 'gear', serial numbers, product numbers, barcodes an' all. I>electronic 'gear', serial numbers, product numbers, barcodes an' all. I >haven't yet bought the sales pitch that you exclusively need the latest >hi-tech gear, or the gear that a particular outfit uses, to make
creative
quoted 1 line or futuristic music.>or futuristic music.
well sure, that's because the gear doesn't really matter at all if the person using it isn't creative; of course this has already been said many times. but i guess there are some who are always looking for the new gear, spending more time drooling over the gear ads than using the gear they already have. and Anthony, you can attest to this for me, as you've heard what i've made w/ my extremely limited gear.. :) . .',`' ;,',' / // christopher graves ',/ ,| \':;.,: |.]\.grav/krac5..;colongib&jujubomb