179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Chris Fahey
To:
'IDM'
Date:
Wed, 7 May 1997 11:24:10 -0400
Subject:
RE: (idm) radio mix
Msg-Id:
<59399FD80187D011A89000A0C925CC7309630B@AQUAMARINE>
Mbox:
idm.9705.gz
So Lazlo's a copyright lawyer? I really don't think you could make 10,000 copies of Thriller and give them away in front of Tower Records and hope to get away with it. "Fair use" means FAIR use. You can copy something onto a mix tape for your commute to work. You can back something up if you don't want to damage the original copy. You can make copies and give them away to demonstrate what something sounds like. You can quote people in articles and use pictures of famous people in newspapers without their permission. But not much more than that. Besides, I don't think the RIAA has the power to decide what is copyrightable and what is not. It seems a little too blatantly unfair that the RIAA can make a deal to take away copyright protection from every musical release in the US. Industry and government often collude to fuck artists and citizens, but this seems a little too libertarian for the feds. If I make my own pressing of CD's, are you saying they are not subject to copyright protection just because of some deal the RIAA made with the US government? I doubt it. Copyright law is very misunderstood. It is VERY VERY strict, and, *fortunately*, very under-enforced. Technically, I can't sing Happy Birthday without paying some old lady in St. Louis for the rights. Technically, I can't play a CD in a bar unless I pay ASCAP royalties. Technically, you have to pay original artists for ALL the samples you use, even if it's only a half-second sample. Technically, I can't show the Nike logo on my shoes in a motion picture without asking Nike. And technically, you can't make a copy someone else's copyrighted stuff. That's why Kinko's won't photocopy books for you - it's a copyright violation to put a book on a photocopier and press "copy". The only exception I know of is Fair Use, which covers journalists mostly, but also to some degree satirists, essayists and commentators. I dont think "commercial vs.non-profit" purposes has anything to do with it. Of course, I'm not a copyright lawyer either. It's just that I've had copyright lawyers tell me "no way" so many times that I'm sick of it. And misinterpreting the law to reflect my anti-copyright political agenda won't help me win a lawsuit. Wishful thinking won't help you against a media giant legal attack. Again, if you are going to violate copyright, recognize the fact that you are doing it before you do so. Then, go for it! -CF
quoted 16 lines -----Original Message-----> -----Original Message----- > From: Miles Egan > > >It's not that simple. We've been over this on the list already > > >(Laslo?). You CAN copy a disk as much as you want & even give > copies > > >away as long as you don't sell them, right? > > > > no not right and people are getting sick of it. > > > > g. > > Apparently you should re-acquaint yourself with the laws that govern > your business, at least in the U.S. Check Laslo's message. If you do > ever give this disk a legitimate pressing, I'll be first in line. > > Miles