On 10-Mar-97, g. scribbled something about Re: (idm) Availability of
Wagonchrist?:
quoted 3 lines i had 186 IDM posts this morning and I read 2 or 3, what is going on?
>i had 186 IDM posts this morning and I read 2 or 3, what is going on?
>twas worthwhile for the top review of chiastic slide by mr reynolds
>however I suppose.
there seem to be too many people who haven't read the IDM pages before they
started posting. When I first got on this list (a few months ago) I would
respond to maybe about 5 posts on average, and then ALL the posts were about
music. now I found myself reading 103 messages and only responding to one.
(the quote with nothing added, sorry ppl.. accident) ..and also maybe 10 of
the posts were about music, if even that. it seems the quality of the
content has gone down severely in the past few months.. :(
-- (this part is to everyone else)
I can't give an opinion about discoteque because I've not heard it.
although U2 is *NOT*, I repeat.. *NOT* an IDM band.. one release does not
make it one. if U2 continues making that kind of music, then I reckon it can
then be considered IDM, but then again, I may very well say discoteque does
not resemble IDM, I would have to hear it first.
Please end the useless bickering.. there is a place for it, it's called
PRIVATE e-mail.
--
__
__\ \ Aurafix aka Hillie / PHD ^ DAMONES
/ /_\ \
http://www.clark.net/pub/buh/index.html
\_____/ >> buh@clark.net >> < > .. >> .<>> >> >
,
m7=
Do re mi fa so la ti .. Oh let's see if we can make it easier..