179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Warren Lapham
To:
objet petit a
Cc:
Date:
Sat, 8 Mar 1997 23:36:44 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) can't we all just get along?
Msg-Id:
<Pine.SOL.3.95.970308232404.11285A-100000@choplifter.rs.itd.umich.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<332239FB.3945@sover.net>
Mbox:
idm.9703.gz
quoted 8 lines in msg. dated blah etc. somebody wrote:> in msg. dated blah etc. somebody wrote: > > > There are no aesthetic absolutes. There should > > be no exceptions. > > The very existence of anything called an 'aesthetic' constitutes the > first instance of an 'aesthetic absolute.' No exceptions? How baldly > totalitarian an Rx is this, anyway?
There's no universally accepted standard of what is "in good taste" or "beautiful" and what is not. Not even outside of this list. We wouldn't be discussing this if there were. I hardly think I'm the one who's trying to be totalitarian. I'm not trying to stop a discussion that is perfectly legitimate according to the "mission statement" of this list...by calling people names, no less.
quoted 2 lines "ALL OPINIONS ARE TO BE RESPECTED."> > "ALL OPINIONS ARE TO BE RESPECTED." > As soon as all opinions are respected, no opinions are respected.
Those words are part of the message that everyone receives upon subscription to the list. Don't you think they ought to affect how we discuss things on the list? -- Warren Lapham (ceremony-owner@monkey.org) laps@umich.edu (laps@monkey.org)