179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Hillie
To:
IDM
Date:
Mon, 24 Feb 1997 12:41:37 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: idm V1 #985
Msg-Id:
<yam6994.1854.130556040@clark.net>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.SGI.3.95.970224002254.20731B-100000@umbc8.umbc.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9702.gz
On 24-Feb-97, wrecktangle scribbled something about (idm) Re: idm V1 #985:
quoted 8 lines the real thing? i can hardly imagine booth & brown or rdj considering the>the real thing? i can hardly imagine booth & brown or rdj considering the >uk releases of their material to be the "real" ones because of differences >in artwork or date of release...and here's my modest approximation of the >delegation of time put in by the artists towards the different >components of the album: music 98% artwork 2%. Which one do you think >they'd like you to pay the most attention to? Artwork isn't worthless or >pointless, but in reality it's just the thin candy shell around something >infinitely more complex.
Yeah but also Richard or Sean/Rob would probably not have it, if the label decided to just throw the artwork they wanted on the sleeve, and just put some shit there. -- __ __\ \ Aurafix aka Hillie / PHD ^ DAMONES / /_\ \ http://www.clark.net/pub/buh/index.html \_____/ >> buh@clark.net >> < > .. >> .<>> >> > , m7= Do re mi fa so la ti .. Oh let's see if we can make it easier..