>
>for the love of god, i actually enjoy this list because it
belittles my knowledge. it's nice to >know that you only know
about 30-40% of the artists being spoken of and that's the
whole >point.
Same here. Furthermore, even the "specialized" stores here
don´t stock a lot of the stuff discussed bar the bigger label
output (such as Warp and Ninja Tune) so this is the only real
place where I
can hear about latest releases and get recommendations on
interesting artists etc.
>this list is a discussion group of I(ntelligent) D(ance)
M(usic) and things related to it.
>
>where will the line be drawn once we start going and
exploring other realms of music?
>
Where indeed ? Should lines be drawn at all ?? From what
I´ve read thru the years on this list, Id say pretty much
everything is fair game for exploration, so long as it meets
some or all the criteria put forward in the explanation.
I, for one, am interested in hearing your definition of
IDM, as chances are it will be as unique as the next persons.
>
>Some of us are "narrowminded" because we don't want to talk
about other types of music.
>
Then by all means, dont say anything...just DELete. Can´t be
that difficult.
>
>when i wanna yap about turntabilism, i post to influx. when i
wanna talk about techno, i >check idm. it's that simple.
history is bound to repeat itself if we ignore the warning of
this >young one's vision: keep it real!
It´s never THAT simple, and I have the archives to prove it.
And as far as keeping it real goes, I think most of us
are..even tho you may not agree with what´s said and done.
>most humbled, shaun
Replies are welcome
btw. How long is it since the FAQ were updated...
Ingi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org