Re: We need more serious criticism of techno! (long rant)
Msg-Id:
<199501242251.XAA15026@lysistrate>
Mbox:
idm.9501.gz
quoted 6 lines On Mon, 23 Jan 1995, ozymandias G desiderata wrote:>On Mon, 23 Jan 1995, ozymandias G desiderata wrote:
>> Quite simply, I disagree with you. Everything we do is
>> political, whether we consider it to be or not. Even your decision to
>> listen to techno and your preference that it stay apolitical is itself
>> a political choice. I'm not going to tell you that you must run out
>>
OK. Then what I was trying to say is that I wish techno music could
keep the apolitical political attitude it has now. (I still think this
is just a weird way of saying "let's stay out of politics").
quoted 11 lines I couldn't agree more. I'm from the UK and I can tell you with supreme>I couldn't agree more. I'm from the UK and I can tell you with supreme
>confidence that being actively involved with techno music - in any way -
>has become, by definition, political. As far as I am concerned Techno,
>along with its related forms of electro music (ie. other essentially
>bare, up tempo stuff), is made primarily for the
>dance floor. To think otherwise is abject folly. So if you don't like
>clubs or Megadogs, etc. you have to go to raves. Raves are for the most
>part illegal nowadays - so you see my point. It might not be so political
>in the States, but in Europe it is! Is Alex Paterson political? Is Andy
>Wetherall political? The Drum Club? Orbital? To say they ARE is an
>understatement. Get with the program.....
But they don't express that in their music right? At least, I
haven't noticed it. The only thing I can think of are some vague
samplings which can be interpreted in any way the listener wants.
You have to admit that techno/rave is very much about escaping from
the problems of the real world into musical trance? At least that is
my impression, and that is a big reason for my liking it so much!
About dance floors ... I don't like to dance, but I love to listen to
techno music, and I know I'm not the only one. But that has been
discussed before ... :-)
/Oskar