179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Date:
Mon, 05 May 1997 11:52:02 -0700
Subject:
(idm) The Orb/Chemical Bros. @ Oakland
Msg-Id:
<199705051854.LAA12092@ns2.accesscom.com>
Mbox:
idm.9705.gz
I didn't realize the Orb was going up on the stage first, but that's how it was. I was late arriving inside the venue by 15 minutes or so, and was surprised to see Patterson already in the full swing when I walked in. They played the set list as posted previously, but they didn't do Tower of Dub (maybe they played in the first 15 minutes). The beats were more dominating on all tunes, definitely harsher than recorded materials, but the core elements of each tune were present, the sampling and the visual effects were very well cordinated. Great groove kept going with the signature sounds of the Orb. Two Chemical Bros. CDs and singles had never sunk in for me, but I thought I'd give it a try with their live set. I left after 20 minutes being bored. Hard beats but didn't see or hear much else. Didn't hear much of the guitar riffs either. Although I don't care about that particular guitar riffs within the context of their sound, that would have contributed to provide bits of texture and color and indifferent beats and saved their set a bit. The kids who were up front by the stage seemed to react to the ~volume~ and occasional breaks of their uniform, pittifully patterned beats, like, ~don't care how they sound, as long as they got the boom boom beats, and the louder the better." If I wanted what I heard in that 20 boring minutes, I'd just go to a local club. Between Orb's set and Chem. Bros, there were two/three guys who filled about a half an hour. They were more interesting and colorful in sounds than this sorry main act. So what's the big deal about these guys? Just my opinion. - wolf -