179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
JMRTNKO! please stand by...
To:
i d i o m
Date:
Mon, 21 Oct 1996 14:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) The Fall of Warp
Msg-Id:
<Pine.3.89.9610211356.A1225-0100000@netcom5.netcom.com>
In-Reply-To:
<3.0b35.32.19961021220824.0068d964@mail.dds.nl>
Mbox:
idm.9610.gz
On Mon, 21 Oct 1996, Adrian Cogger wrote:
quoted 3 lines it seems like their output is getting less interesting every release.> it seems like their output is getting less interesting every release. > what's their last new artist or thing they came up with? > their losing their identity <><>
Actually, I think the whole genre is losing it's identity. When Warp started out, dance music was pretty much either house or bleep. Warp also had much less serious competition as a label. So it was easier to single out the good artists and easier to sign them. Now everything's become a lot fuzzier. Which is a *good* thing, in my opinion. The music seems to have superceded the equipment (though you wouldn't know it from some of the mailing lists). Much the same thing happened to typography in the late eighties. Emigre's obviously bitmapped stuff was tres hip as it screamed "computer." Now it's largely vanished as more artists made more type in increasingly different directions. So like Emigre, Warp is now one voice among many. I still like a lot of their stuff, but it's been a while since I've thrown my allegiance to any one label. There's just too much out there (and too little money) for that. Probably the same for way for artists now. Too many labels to just rely on one. jmar! slow day at work... | J M R T N K O | fonstrosities and other toys by ILLGBLITY ENGNRING. | | D S G N E T C | JOHN-A MARTINKO, w. desk chief martinko@netcom.com |