179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Dave Walker
To:
I D M
Date:
Sun, 7 May 1995 12:53:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: Roland machines (was Antacid is ph neutral)
Msg-Id:
<Pine.BSD/.3.91.950507124101.25383A-100000@conch.aa.msen.com>
In-Reply-To:
<199505071604.MAA08021@red.seas.upenn.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9505.gz
On Sun, 7 May 1995, Howard Cheng wrote:
quoted 1 line Does anyone know why Roland discontinued the 303, 808, 909, et.al?> Does anyone know why Roland discontinued the 303, 808, 909, et.al?
There was a gap of about 5 years between when they stopped selling these things and when they started showing up cheaply in pawn shops, and became the basis for so many of the records we listen to. This topic comes up regularly on the Analogue Heaven mailing list, but in a nutshell... 1. Because these instruments use discrete circuits rather than the "synth on a chip" found today in most mass-market electronic instruments, they are considerably more expensive to manufacture. 2. In a business sense, its more lucrative for Roland to focus on the home sample-playback and soundcard market than for them to devote resources to what is, in today's market terms, a "fringe" element of the music-making community -- people who want tweakable knobs and funny sounds from their instruments, rather than a "super accurate piano sample." on now: X-102 ----------------------------------------------------------------- dave walker, detroit art services marmoset@conch.aa.msen.com me & my robots