179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

fwd

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1994-01-13 06:18Brian Behlendorf fwd
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1994-01-13 06:18Brian Behlendorf--- Forwarded mail from idm-owner@techno.Stanford.EDU From idm-owner Wed Jan 12 17:47:05 1
From:
Brian Behlendorf
Date:
Wed, 12 Jan 1994 22:18:04 PST
Subject:
fwd
--- Forwarded mail from idm-owner@techno.Stanford.EDU From idm-owner Wed Jan 12 17:47:05 1994 Received: by techno.Stanford.EDU (4.1/1.34) id AA11675; Wed, 12 Jan 94 17:47:02 PST Date: Wed, 12 Jan 94 17:47:02 PST Message-Id: <9401130147.AA11675@techno.Stanford.EDU> To: idm-owner@techno.Stanford.EDU From: idm-owner@techno.Stanford.EDU Subject: BOUNCE idm@techno.stanford.edu: Non-member submission from [Ian Smith <heidi@cix.compulink.co.uk>] From heidi@cix.compulink.co.uk Wed Jan 12 17:46:56 1994 Received: from eros.britain.eu.net by techno.Stanford.EDU (4.1/1.34) id AA11667; Wed, 12 Jan 94 17:46:56 PST Received: from compulink.co.uk by eros.britain.eu.net with UUCP id <sg.11694-0@eros.britain.eu.net>; Thu, 13 Jan 1994 01:46:29 +0000 Received: from smtpsrvr by cix.compulink.co.uk id aa24634; 13 Jan 94 1:23 GMT Received: by gonzales.compulink.co.uk. (5.65/25-eef) id AA24338; Thu, 13 Jan 94 01:23:08 GMT Date: Thu, 13 Jan 94 01:23 GMT0 From: Ian Smith <heidi@cix.compulink.co.uk> Subject: Re: Free Records To: bpalmer@jupiter.willamette.edu Cc: idm@techno.Stanford.EDU, bpm@andrew.cmu.edu Reply-To: heidi@cix.compulink.co.uk Message-Id: <memo.254108@cix.compulink.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.05.9401121202.A2381-a100000@jupiter> In the UK you have to prove to each label that you'll help them promote their music - by charting their records and sending a chart return to the three main chart organisations (DJ magazine, DMC and Record Mirror). That's why the UK Club charts are a completely useless piece of crap - they're just a count of how many free records one company's sent out when compared with another. Most of the labels basically threaten to take you off their mailing list if you don't chart what they send and it seems the majority just go along with it, charting rubbish, safe in the knowledge that no-one else will see their chart and at least it means they'll keep getting free records. I gathered the situation is a lot different in the US in that as a DJ you have to join a record pool. The pool ranks you in importance depending on which venues you play and how often and the labels give the records to the pools to distribute as they see fit. Seems a much better system to me because the DJ's aren't under so much pressure to pretend something crap is good and they can give honest reactions. So I guess you have to find out what pools are operating in your area and then try and get on one. Ian (in the UK) --- End of forwarded message from idm-owner@techno.Stanford.EDU