179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) wumpscut

4 messages · 4 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1999-05-11 16:55(idm) wumpscut
1999-05-11 17:39Tomas Jirku Re: (idm) wumpscut
├─ 1999-05-11 17:44Aaron S Michelson Re: (idm) wumpscut
└─ 1999-05-11 17:50Greg Clow Re: (idm) wumpscut
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-05-11 16:55Ambientidm@aol.comhello everyone, i just downloaded an mp3 from the bleep:bloop server that says it's a gesc
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, 11 May 1999 12:55:27 EDT
Subject:
(idm) wumpscut
permalink · <d813864c.2469baff@aol.com>
hello everyone, i just downloaded an mp3 from the bleep:bloop server that says it's a gescom remix of wumpscut. does anyone have any further information? i am looking for month/year released, matrix number, track listing. thanks, bmP
1999-05-11 17:39Tomas Jirku>i just downloaded an mp3 from the bleep:bloop server that says it's a >gescom >remix of w
From:
Tomas Jirku
To:
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 11 May 1999 13:39:11 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) wumpscut
permalink · <37386B3F.F1C@yirku.com>
quoted 3 lines i just downloaded an mp3 from the bleep:bloop server that says it's a >gescom>i just downloaded an mp3 from the bleep:bloop server that says it's a >gescom >remix of wumpscut. does anyone have any further information? i am >looking >for month/year released, matrix number, track listing.
i'm listening to this one now. yet another autechre/gesom remix for bleepbloop that doesn't convince me. no way in hell is this a gescom remix. it's standard fare industrial music that one would expect from the likes of wumpscut (or leatherstrip, or x marks the pedwalk, or etc.). can anyone explain that remix of Stereolab that is supposedly autechre as well? tomas
1999-05-11 17:44Aaron S MichelsonExcerpts from mail: 11-May-99 Re: (idm) wumpscut by Tomas Jirku@yirku.com > can anyone exp
From:
Aaron S Michelson
To:
,
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 11 May 1999 13:44:23 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) wumpscut
Reply to:
Re: (idm) wumpscut
permalink · <0rC6lrO00UiA04zK80@andrew.cmu.edu>
Excerpts from mail: 11-May-99 Re: (idm) wumpscut by Tomas Jirku@yirku.com
quoted 2 lines can anyone explain that remix of Stereolab that is supposedly autechre> can anyone explain that remix of Stereolab that is supposedly autechre > as well?
That one is legitimate.... can't speak for the Wumpscut though. I've seen the Autechre remix on CD/vinyl.... I think it's quite good, actually. Aaron
1999-05-11 17:50Greg ClowOn Tue, 11 May 1999, Tomas Jirku wrote: > can anyone explain that remix of Stereolab that
From:
Greg Clow
To:
Date:
Tue, 11 May 1999 13:50:05 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) wumpscut
Reply to:
Re: (idm) wumpscut
permalink · <Pine.BSI.3.96r.990511134859.4273A-100000@shell1.interlog.com>
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Tomas Jirku wrote:
quoted 2 lines can anyone explain that remix of Stereolab that is supposedly autechre> can anyone explain that remix of Stereolab that is supposedly autechre > as well?
It's legit. I've got it on a US promo 12", and I think it appeared on 12" and CD in a couple of other countries. Greg