179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: (idm) Bump Uglies (get it?) (yep)

4 messages · 4 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: (idm) bump analog (get it?) (no) · (idm) bump uglies (get it?) (yep)
1997-02-27 13:17PhilE Re: (idm) Bump Analog (get it?) (no)
└─ 1997-02-28 22:25Eric Frans Re: (idm) Bump Analog (get it?) (no)
1997-02-28 22:29Brock Suter Re: (idm) Bump Uglies (get it?) (yep)
1997-02-28 23:00Gonzi (Fresh) Re: (idm) Bump Uglies (get it?) (yep)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-02-27 13:17PhilEStyrolene vaT <kung.funk@virgin.net> wrote: > However i think the likelyhood of just havin
From:
PhilE
To:
Date:
Thu, 27 Feb 1997 13:17:53 +0000
Subject:
Re: (idm) Bump Analog (get it?) (no)
permalink · <48280331CBE@bagpuss.argonaut.com>
Styrolene vaT <kung.funk@virgin.net> wrote:
quoted 4 lines However i think the likelyhood of just having one box that more> However i think the likelyhood of just having one box that more > than adequately does the lot is about five years or so off yet, > its about as likely as a paperless office. Now if you could > fashion a studio from intelligent utility fog......
Yeah, I was thinking about this a while back, and (after some discussions with real musicians) came to similar conclusions. It's all >technically< possible now, but the interface is a really sticky area. Musicians are too used to physical controls, which for your one-box studio, means you'll need some configurable controllers. The proposals for DirectInput provide an API to do this, but I digress. What's lacking is the will to do all this. Can you see AKAI making their nice profitable samplers obsolete, and entering the software market instead? Maybe Steinberg, but it'll cost a fortune, and be pirated on an enormous scale, so we'll all get to play with it. Well, here's hoping. Phil PS ObIDM: How were Autechre & the Surgeon @ the Blue Note? I missed it due to obligations at work. ...I feel laaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAve...
1997-02-28 22:25Eric FransThis whole discussion of using a computer for your entire studio brings to mind a remark b
From:
Eric Frans
To:
idm
Date:
Fri, 28 Feb 1997 15:25:24 -0700 (MST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Bump Analog (get it?) (no)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Bump Analog (get it?) (no)
permalink · <Pine.OSF.3.95.970228151756.22964A-100000@engr.arizona.edu>
This whole discussion of using a computer for your entire studio brings to mind a remark by Mixmaster Morris. I could have sworn I read in a magazine a long while back that his ultimate goal was to be able to eliminate all the external keyboards, samplers, etc. and narrow it all down to a single comptuer. Does anyone else out there remember reading this as well? Perhaps the man himself would like to pipe in if he's listening. I'd love to hear his insights on this topic. | E r i c | [mail] franse@engr.arizona.edu | | F r a n s | [web] http://intermix.engr.arizona.edu/~franse | "Make the events occur that you want to occur" - The Black Dog
1997-02-28 22:29Brock SuterEric Frans wrote: > > This whole discussion of using a computer for your entire studio > b
From:
Brock Suter
To:
idm
Date:
Fri, 28 Feb 1997 14:29:54 -0800
Subject:
Re: (idm) Bump Uglies (get it?) (yep)
permalink · <33175C62.41C6@alchemyfx.com>
Eric Frans wrote:
quoted 8 lines This whole discussion of using a computer for your entire studio> > This whole discussion of using a computer for your entire studio > brings to mind a remark by Mixmaster Morris. I could have sworn I read in > a magazine a long while back that his ultimate goal was to be able to > eliminate all the external keyboards, samplers, etc. and narrow it all > down to a single comptuer. Does anyone else out there remember reading > this as well? Perhaps the man himself would like to pipe in if he's > listening. I'd love to hear his insights on this topic.
Not to sure about that one, but I recall our resident pervert, rdj, making a comment kind of like that. Something to the effect that he wasn't going to play live gigs anymore until he could do a whole set from one small black box. And this was said a few years ago... garbly warbly yours, brock np: The Reverend Horton Heat - 'Liquor in The Front'
1997-02-28 23:00Gonzi (Fresh)>AFX... > Something to the effect that he wasn't going to play live gigs anymore > until h
From:
Gonzi (Fresh)
To:
Date:
Fri, 28 Feb 1997 15:00:12 -0800
Subject:
Re: (idm) Bump Uglies (get it?) (yep)
permalink · <3317637C.168A@linkonline.net>
quoted 5 lines AFX...>AFX... > Something to the effect that he wasn't going to play live gigs anymore > until he could do a whole set from one small black box. > > And this was said a few years ago...
This is what he is doing now, playing his enitre show from a single Mac laptop. Think he said it took him a year to get all his old tracks programmed in there. Also read somewhere where he says he doesn't even use keyboards any more, he just uses the computer. -FgRoEnSzHi