thanks for the link to the des cailloux et du carbone EP -- very nice
indeed.
if you like this, you might want to check out "from here we go the
sublime" by the field
On 10 Jan 2008, at 23:28, idm-digest-help@hyperreal.org wrote:
quoted 59 lines -----Original Message-----
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Max & Mark [mailto:expe@madicoinc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 7:37 AM
> To: 'mantrakid'
> Subject: RE: [idm] Sample Based Techno
>
> I think this release is sampled only, and its pretty good , and its
> free
>
> http://www.vagueterrain.net/content/archives/journal07/des%20cailloux/vague
> %
> 20terrain%2007_%20sample%20culture_%20des%20cailloux%20et%20du
> %20carbone.zip
>
> peace
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : mantrakid [mailto:mantrakid@neferiu.com]
> Envoyé : 4 janvier 2008 00:10
> À : 'Armchair Techno'
> Objet : RE: [idm] Sample Based Techno
>
> But im not at all talking about production technology. It doesn't
> matter to
> me if the synth sound is coming out of a moog, mpc, reason, fruity
> loops or
> cool edit, a synth sound is a synth sound.
>
> I'm talking about sampling in the tradition of hip hop as i've said
> a few
> times now. So taking a clip of an old 70's funk song and making
> techno out
> of it. I can honestly say i have no consciously heard any music or
> artists
> doing that, so that's why im asking.
>
> I know techno is close to house/disco house/etc so i want to express
> that
> looping a 70's disco track with some 909 on top and some chick
> moaning &
> singing overtop it all is not what im talking about...
>
> I mean gritty dirty DJ Muggs, DJ Format, Mark B, Old Beastie Boys,
> etc.
>
> Here's an example *kinda* what im talking about but even this is a
> bit too
> glitchy & crisp. Im looking for more 'low fi' type shit.
>
> http://www.zshare.net/audio/6127257c3d16a2/
>
> Don't mean to be a fucker but im getting frustrated cuz it seems
> like im
> either not expressing myself clearly or else im not being understood
> properly. In either situation, i apologize. :D
>
> Isnt this fun?
>