I think that's what makes glitch doesn't exclude 'computer generated
music', but instead highlights a sub-group of it. "Glitch" has often
been used interchangeably with "post-digital" (although I don't they
they're perfectly equivalent), which suggests to me that glitch isn't
just about technology, but about a particular attitude towards
technology that at once glorifies it and ironizes it. In other
words, glitch seems to be what happens when the "honeymoon" with
technological perfection passes: rather than reject technology as
"empty" or "false" perfection, glitch put the whole notion of audio
perfection into question.
back to making prickly pear sorbet,
LMG
On Sep 3, 2005, at 7:28 PM, pulse wrote:
quoted 19 lines So would we wouldn't group 'computer generated music' into the
> So would we wouldn't group 'computer generated music' into the
> category as well then? This defeintion seems to exclude that group
> of music which typically seems to be classified as glitch - even
> though it is deinetly produced without failures.
>
>
>> Interpretation: an approach to art objects that seeks out and
>> prioritizes moments of technological failure.
>>
>
> --
> s.
> http://www.ArcTone.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org