I don't think the guy denigrates dance music in general, as apparent
simplicity and flow don't prevent intelligence.
Making things seemingly easy takes a great deal of intelligence actually.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 12:40 PM Lee Stacey <lee@leestacey.com> wrote:
quoted 50 lines It's a slightly annoying initialism when you think it's not always
> It's a slightly annoying initialism when you think it's not always
> intelligent or danceable, and sometimes not even particularly musical
> (especially when I make it😉)... but after 30something years, I've gotten
> used to it. Now I lean in. It's like dance music but intelligent. That
> works for me.
>
> Genre names often don't fit perfectly but they are a handy signpost for
> pointing you in the direction of music you might like.
>
> *- Pilchard*
> pilchard.org
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 11:30 AM Laurent Knauth <laurent.knauth@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Conversely, i find that, thanks to the DJ-bias, he manages to define
>> «IDM» vs «DM» to the point, something that everyone (i think) has always
>> been struggling with, like :
>> - What is IDM ?
>> - ∅
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:40 AM Lee Stacey <lee@leestacey.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I like the way he enters with low expectations because he’s thinking
>>> “dance music”. Then that face. Glorious stuff.
>>>
>>> Thanks for sharing.
>>>
>>> - Pilchard
>>> pilchard.org
>>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 4:36 am, David Seruyange <g3scom@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ypw5-elpYA
>>>>
>>>> OGs like me should enjoy this one. My face does the same thing when I
>>>> hear music I like.
>>>>
>>>> - David
>>>>
>>> --
>>> *Lee Stacey*
>>>
>>> t: @LStacey <https://twitter.com/LStacey>
>>> w: leestacey.com
>>> p: +44 (0)7415 118 329
>>>
>>