Bush versus Kerry
The loser - America
-d.
<
http://www.virtumundo.com/signature/dotrow.gif>
<
http://www.virtumundo.com/signature/fulllogo.gif>
Daniel Fox
Traffic Coordinator/Customer Relations
Virtumundo, Inc.
8400 West 110th Street
Suite 330
Overland Park, KS 66210
<
http://www.virtumundo.com/signature/nil.gif>
ph 9 1 3 6 6 0 1 3 1 2
<mailto:chobson@virtumundo.com> dfox@virtumundo.com
<
http://www.virtumundo.com/signature/nil.gif>
<
http://www.virtumundo.com/signature/nil.gif>
-----Original Message-----
From: Brandon [mailto:gozravp@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:54 AM
To: Glowdot Dot Com; idm@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [idm] Re: [OT] Bush sucks and philippe-petit doesn't
<<He supposedly put this plan of miraculous World
Domination(tm) into play
within hours after 9/11. I'd called that pretty
fucking genius. For a man
who before 9/11 was a hillbilly hayseed, he sure seems
to be pulling a lot
of devious schemes behind America's back. I just want
to know, which is it?>>
A minor point on this one and its something I've been
thinking about quite a bit lately. These two
seemingly contradictory states of nature are not
contradictory at all if you take an honest look at the situation. If there
was a plan for "world domination" (I believe there certainly was a good bit
of progress on certain agendas, call it world domination to be dramatic or
typical American behavior, which in my opinion is slightly less than "world
domination" but considerably greater than a healthy relationship with the
vast majority of the world's population) it sure as hell wasn't advanced by
President Bush. I'd prefer to call it a "shift in world order" but whatever
you call it, it would be of complete ignorance to believe that the bumbling
dipshit we refer to as President has anything to do with the overall
advancement of this agenda (whatever you want to call it) rather than his
handlers - one of which will be faithfully by his side next week in the 9-11
commission, doubtless as Bush couldn't even hold a 20 minute press
conference without sounding like a complete clown ("See here, nobody likes
to see dead bodies on television." note: the preceding quote was edited for
grunts, stammering and other vulgarities that would get someone booted out
of a high school rhetoric class) let alone face questions concerning one of
the most serious events in
world history.
The President of the United States, for the most part,
is crafted to be whatever an almost endless team of
engineers tell him to be. Reagan fit this well, after
all he was an actor. Clinton was slick and very
intelligent. Immoral but intelligent. The
interesting thing about Bush is here we have a
president so fucking stupid that he can't even seem to
read the cards his handlers feed him. Bush crafting a
plan after 9-11.... Good god man, he can't even
address a single reporter without that
dear-in-headlights lock-up over a dozen
"ummmmmmmmmmm"s...
Not to go into the nature of the advancement of
US/world relationships, I would only ask the
following: please don't mistake that Bush's sheer
ignorance and, frankly, completely embarrassing nature
has one thing to do with the overall evolution of
these global trends. He has, as he would put it,
"thinkers" to do that for him.
He is a good cowboy. The one thing he had going for
him was his appeal to the type of person who believes
that everything is either good or bad. This works very
well up until around the point when people start to
see too many of their fellow citizens being
slaughtered in a war he (his handlers) has yet to
answer some serious questions about - and NOT just
stammer on about "how evil Saddam was", or when things
get worse how "REALLY evil Saddam was". There comes a
point when things get so bad that thinking is forced
on even the most happily ignorant and the passive
believers of whatever shit he mispronounces down their
throats aren't satisfied. They can't be. It is too
serious. You need look no further than the letters
from military families, the incredible amount of
unanswered questions, lack of faith and deterioration
of the endeavor in its entirety. The military is
stretched to the breaking point; top military brass
will tell you that. The fact that they would even
CONSIDER a draft tells us a whole lot. We know what
that leads to in the face of illegitimate war, and I
am filled with such unbelievable hope that there is a
draft enacted - it would lead to the best thing to
happen to the nation since the civil rights movement,
anyone with any sense of the obvious knows exactly
what I'm talking about - think 1969.
It'll take more than an air craft carrier landing to
salvage that one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org