179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Albers, Brian A.
To:
robert stanton ,
Date:
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:08:08 -0800
Subject:
RE: [idm] RE: best of 2003 ?
Msg-Id:
<93A9F34BCE80564DAE950EE870B00D3A0FAE21@SDIMAIL01.usa.ccu.clearchannel.com>
Mbox:
idm.0312.gz
Or it's just a fun way to let the other list members know what releases we've enjoyed this year. Damn, dude, it's not rocket science. Hello list, I think that the 'best of 2003' concept is not a productive thread topic, and as such would advise list-members to forgo writing one. As some of you may recall, I once ran a site devoted towards 'reviewing' electronic music and was very much a part of the whole 'rating albums' schema. Since that has ended, however, I have had time to reflect on the status of music in contemporary society and have found that even in the 'underground,' it is viewed as and expected to be an industry. This should not be surprising considering that 'popular' music is an industry that we are constantly exposed on a daily basis; what transpires, then, is a connection with music as pertaining to some 'industry,' whatever it may be. The purpose of most music 'reviewing' today is to provide, then, a consumptive schema for what is being reviewed; what ultimately comes to the fore is whether or not the album is worth purchasing. Partly as a result of this, critical interpretation is limited or ignored altogether, and the significance of any one piece of music is dissolved into exchange value instead of use value. 'Best of' lists must be viewed in this context as they are, typically, lists of recommendations to purchase based upon someone else's abstract notions of worth. The most one usually receives is an artist and album, along with a sentence or two of why the album is 'good,' which essentially translates into why it should be consumed. Thus, 'best of' lists are nothing more than advertising (as much as we would like to believe they are expressions of personal aesthetic) and contribute to a standardization of music. This occurs because the small descriptions become templates for further production (this word was chosen explicitly for its meaning) of music in the future. In popular music, a conservatism develops regardless of artistic endeavors in part because of the limited forms allowed by the culture industry; all else is regarded as 'alien' and thus 'not good.' Of course this effect is minimal in the lesser-known musics as they are less dominated by a hierarchy of public opinion and culture industry dissemination; still, we can see the early fragments of this developing here as well, as many yearn for the 'good old days.' This is why I feel 'best of' lists are not useful in the least, and a new way of expressing opinion must be created. I would like to present the idea of a collective listening and discussion of albums that members feel are excellent (not necessarily exclusively from this year). While I am not sure what the exact result of this would be, it most likely would disrupt the pattern of 'this is good so consume' mentality, bring participating listmembers closer, and potentially return thoughtful listening and discussion to the music. If enough are interested, I will be happy to set up the framework for such an endeavor (others would be welcomed to lead, of course). Regards, Robert _________________________________________________________________ Don’t worry if your Inbox will max out while you are enjoying the holidays. Get MSN Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org