179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Wes
To:
Connor Higgins
Cc:
John D. , IDM
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:47:03 +0100
Subject:
Re: waffles
Msg-Id:
<BLU436-SMTP1679889AA8BF761828A12B8CE920@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To:
<CACqEri1QwcwCfO3PpbJM2QXkjFQRzOgo5jhuyHA86Z8VXebreg@mail.gmail.com>
Mbox:
idm-2014-10.gz
I only listened to the sampler track that was out a while ago and was fairly unimpressed. Irrespective of style I thought it was a little dull. Hopefully the album is better though! Sent from my iPhone
quoted 45 lines On 23 Oct 2014, at 05:38, Connor Higgins <connor1higgins@gmail.com> wrote:> On 23 Oct 2014, at 05:38, Connor Higgins <connor1higgins@gmail.com> wrote: > > So, uh, who's taken the time to listen to Clark's new album? I've been streaming it via bleep (c? I r gud guy). Damn good, but not what I was expecting (as usual). Reminds me of WOW- Mouse on Mars: EDM influenced IDM. > > > >> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:19 PM, John D. <johndalton@pchome.com.tw> wrote: >> With sounds missing, like? It could be ambient maybe unless you purchased the beats. >> >>> there's that word "decent" right between "got" and "monetization". >>> >>> i wonder if an album app with in-app-purchases would make a dime >>> >>> --- >>> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com >>> http://lackluster.org >>> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com >>> iPhone: +358403703659 >>> >>>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:52, Esa Juhani Ruoho <esaruoho@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> so anyone think Best Fiends has got monetization or is it all an in-app-purchase rip-off? >>>> >>>> --- >>>> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com >>>> http://lackluster.org >>>> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com >>>> iPhone: +358403703659 >>>> >>>>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:51, Jared Dunne <22tape@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Be well, my friend, Jon. >>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 22, 2014 3:49 PM, "Jon Sands" <fohdeesha@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/22/2014 3:31 PM, Jared Dunne wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh, the beautiful human trait of deflection. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nah, I think I just speak for the majority of this list (and Zack summed it up well) that nobody is really interested in wasting any more effort responding to the extremely poor straw man you have repeatedly tried to make. We'd rather talk about something interesting. I think the moment you made the hilarious comparison of physical objects to copyright, most of the people here lost interest in you. It's ok though, I'm sure you'll get some poor sap here soon willing to argue with you >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Jon Sands >>>>>> Fohdeesha Media >>>>>> http://fohdeesha.com/ >