179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Alan R. Lockett
To:
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:02:49 +1000
Subject:
Re: [idm] the topic of discussion
Msg-Id:
<1027659769.3d40d7fa00db8@www-mail.usyd.edu.au>
In-Reply-To:
<16e.111683a7.2a71c23c@aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.0207.gz
My initial thought is that there have been any number of more 'mainstream' acts incorporating some of the sonic elements of idm into their music for some time. Radiohead got noticed because their fundamental sound, premised on a rock dynamics and structures, changed so markedly with Kid-A. Acts such as, say, Chemical Brothers, Prodigy, Orbital, Underworld have been knocking around the edges of the mainstream for a good while, elaborating on a template forged in the club/rave culture of the early 90s. Arguably these artists have done more to dispose a mass audience to aspects of the sound of idm, but I would't say that it could be regarded as 'taking idm into the mainstream' any more than Craig Armstrong is taking classical late-romanticism into the mainstream or Massive Attack is taking dub into the mainstream. Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that artists in the 'mainstream' (a rather woolly concept anyway) are just drawing more eclectically from a pool of sonic resources which are associated with particular sub-genres? alan/beyond...sound Quoting Oneaphex@aol.com:
quoted 5 lines Radiohead is taking idm into the mainstream. what are your thoughts list?> > Radiohead is taking idm into the mainstream. what are your thoughts list? > > np: amnesiac >
------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: www-mail.usyd.edu.au --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org