I saw Kit Clayton demonstrate this at Sonar i Barcelona, and I was very
impressed. I've been developing similar-ish software with at couple of
friends, and Jitter was pretty much what we originally envisioned for
our software. It turned out different though, mainly to keep the
framerate up. The problem (I think) with Jitter is that it's so
ultra-modular and scalable, that it must have an impact on speed. I
haven't tried Jitter myself, but based on my own experience it seems
that the more scalable, the slower, but this is of course only a problem
for realtime live stuff, when rendering to a file it hardly matters.
Anyway, I'm also looking very much forward to Jitter, might have to buy
myself a Mac.
-Stefan
(www.effekts.dk)
Richard Gray wrote:
quoted 29 lines Wow!! Thanks for mentioning this, as I hadn't heard of it before. I've
>Wow!! Thanks for mentioning this, as I hadn't heard of it before. I've
>done work with visuals at parties and live shows before, so this is most
>interesting to me....
>
>The list of features is incredible... If they can pull it off in a fast,
>stable (of utmost importance in a live situation) package, then it could be
>somewhat of a killer app for live video. It's very reasonably priced too...
>
>So much for nato.....
>
>Here's the link if anyone else is interested...
>
>http://www.cycling74.com/products/jitter.html
>
>Catchya Later,
>
>Richard
>
>>or the forthcomnig jitter package for max/msp
>>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
>
>