At 11:23 AM 10/12/2001 -0500, you wrote:
quoted 7 lines I'm sure this has been debated quite a bit by now -- probably to the point>I'm sure this has been debated quite a bit by now -- probably to the point
>of monotony -- but I'd like to talk about it for a moment. I'm not good at
>explaining music in metaphors. Confield sounds like a fractal to me
>whereas Tri Repetae sounds like a painting. That's the only way I can
>explain it. I can respect the auto-generational nature of Confield on some
>level, but I can't listen to it. It's not a bad album by any means. It
>might even be a great album. It's just not my thing.
What makes you think Confield is generative, and Tri Repetae isn't?
derek
-------
eggytoast.com
-------
fresh like pie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org