179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Chris Taylor
To:
Juho Hietala
Cc:
IDM List
Date:
Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:42:57 -0400
Subject:
Re: second woman - s/w
Msg-Id:
<CAAT3gwEeSU2qkWHfnWLXgg+-hmyPEA=uiDJyspQKY-PQRkWW3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
<F17B1125-52BA-4320-88D6-EBF64F853AA1@gmail.com>
Mbox:
idm-2017-04.gz
by "epic" I mean like the fist-pumping, determined, slightly melancholic, festival sized emotion that I hear in stuff like Nils frahm, Clark, Max Cooper and a lot of the anthemic indie rock the kids like these days like Arcade Fire or something. kind of post-rock derived although it has reached car commercial popularity. turns me off of a lot of current music that could be described as melodic. not Second Woman. they are on the right side of history. On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Juho Hietala <hietala@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted 36 lines put the lp on 33 and its pretty epic :)> put the lp on 33 and its pretty epic :) > > > On 27 Apr 2017, at 21:42, Chris Taylor <christaylor415@gmail.com> wrote: > > What's cool about Mark Fell is that his music could've actually been made > 10, even 20 years ago. I think the existing listenership has changed their > set of values to be more open to something as minimal and unadorned as what > Mark Fell does - people's listening has gotten more patient and the novelty > of maximal digital music (say Richard Devine, Autechre etc) got enough play > that the simplicity of Fell became extremely appealing. So what's "forward" > or refreshing or whatever about isn't about utilizing new tools that > haven't yet existed or making a crazy synthesis of various styles or > creating a complete novel music vocabulary but making music that works > extremely well in this particular moment. > > That's not to say this isn't taking Mark Fells style and doing something > else with it; it haven't even heard it. Just an insight re: Fell that I > wanted to share. > > The first Second Woman release sounded pretty good to me, I particular > liked the melodic sheen on it that wasn't corny or "epic". > > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Rjyan Kidwell <cexwell@gmail.com> wrote: > >> are ya sure it's not too the same as mark fell to be "forward"? >> >> i mean, it's not as egregious as those Gabor Lazar records, but it's so >> spot-on teethin Mr. Fell's technique it often kinda might as well be Mark >> Fell samples dropped into more layer-y/conventional song arrangements >> > > >