179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Artie Qewpie
To:
Date:
Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:31:08 -0400
Subject:
Re: idm list dissed
Msg-Id:
<5421D88C.4070703@tymnet.net>
In-Reply-To:
<CAHw2A=CyrYHahTrsWqXd6YYK8p7CaPebpOKb+9TNoY8voxi5Hw@mail.gmail.com>
Mbox:
idm-2014-09.gz
The map is not the territory, and Leary's 8-circuit model is a 60's timewarp. ;) On 9/23/2014 2:32 PM, Basma O wrote:
quoted 76 lines It is my favorite genre ehem subject of discussion! Idm is not a genre,> It is my favorite genre ehem subject of discussion! Idm is not a genre, > it's just a new way of music all together, think about it how many genres > that are genres that we can also call idm? Intelligent dance music, is > probably the fourth circuit of the collective brain the new intelligence as > consciousness or something, like when modern art hit the classical walls it > wasn't a new classical genre it was a whole new way of looking at light and > reality! > > Oh well , is there a genre called jeanz n greenz? I thought I heard someone > talk about it... :D > On Sep 23, 2014 9:09 PM, "John D." <johndalton@pchome.com.tw> wrote: > >> Well, been a pretty long time since we had this conversation for the nth >> time, and it won't last long. The next time will probably be longer away >> and less long, if you get my drift. In fifty years there will probably be a >> single post about it after 20 years or something. >> >> I never understood why so much time is wasted on bitching about a name of >> a genre of music. Better things..... >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Zombiefly <zombiefly@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> i always preferred the label "electronica" for the genre. But at the time >>> IDM came to be because the UK was dancing in fields to 4-4 beat piano >>> tracks inter-dispersed with hoover sounds. It was viewed that Autechre etc. >>> was more "listening music", therefore more intelligent than the generic >>> fodder blasting into the countryside at 6am.... i guess :) >>> >>> On 23 September 2014 13:32, kawayama <kawayama@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> bit too much nit-picking and defensiveness going on here, i think. >>>> "intelligent dance music" is an okay name for a mailing list, but a >>>> horrible name for a genre, can we not all agree on that? >>>> >>>> and Warp only named their compilation "artificial intelligence", as in >>>> the scientific concept, they never claimed the music was more intelligent >>>> than other music. in fact, Warp called it 'listening music' in the liner >>>> notes. it was the creators of this list who named it. >>>> >>>> k >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> constant shallowness leads to evil. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> _____________________________________________ >>> Sent from my Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48K >>> _____________________________________________ >>> noise I make: >>> http://www.soundcloud.com/pushkin >>> http://www.last.fm/music/Pushkin >>> >>> noise I like: >>> http://www.last.fm/user/zombiefly >>> >>> sites I run: >>> http://www.ctran.co.uk >>> http://o-fu-online.net >>> ------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> 22tape/jared dunne >> listen <http://22tape.com> >> >> >> >
-- --arturius qewpie that which is, is wat