Cheers, didn't realise I only sent it to you. What an amateur.
Mem
quoted 27 lines On 16 Oct 2015, at 14:31, Zombiefly <zombiefly@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 Oct 2015, at 14:31, Zombiefly <zombiefly@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> replying to mehmet's comment which came directly to me, not the list:
>
> I read a bit about the making of the album - including an interview -
> and though the concept may be tired, the voices are very real. I don't
> think the sound bites are ill fitting, I think it's the music that is
> ill fitting. The music does absolutely nothing to add to the
> narrative. I suppose it's only interesting if you're interested in the
> story that they are trying to tell but, it's not good enough to hold
> my attention. It feels a bit like a university/college project and
> you're right; there's not a lot said that hasn't been said before and
> has been said and done better. Would rather watch a decent documentary
> on YouTube. As far as just music goes, yeah, it's weak as fuck.
>
> Mem
>
>
> yeah, i agree its the music that's weak. i swear i heard the same
> track 3 times throughout listening to the album. the vocals are so
> weak, they can barely stand up. the music is poor. it's like an album
> constructed out of gaseous farts with samples thrown in to somehow
> give it a purpose.
>
> 0/10 :)
>
>> So tell me, is it better than Lexicon of Goods? --- | Esa Ruoho | +358403703659 | http://fi.linkedin.com/in/esaruoho | | http://lackluster.bandcamp.com | http://lackluster.org | http://esaruoho.tumblr.com | | http://twitter.com/esaruoho | http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial |