179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
ChairCrusher
To:
david turgeon
Cc:
iduhntuhbelluhbiguhbent duhbance muhbusuhbic
Date:
Thu, 5 Aug 1999 16:16:21 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) meta-modern
Msg-Id:
<Pine.HPP.3.96.990805161355.17327U-100000@arthur.avalon.net>
In-Reply-To:
<37A9F991.B182540B@evolutiontech.com>
Mbox:
idm.9908.gz
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, david turgeon wrote:
quoted 9 lines 7. Signal and noise are artificial distinctions. You can make the noise> > 7. Signal and noise are artificial distinctions. You can make the noise > > the signal -- see Oval again. > > so if there's no distinction between anything, how come do people still > manage to find oval's songs 'soothing' & say, disc's songs 'disturbing', > considering that they use the same source material? > > can postmodernism answer that? >
We're meta-modern here, not postmodern. there is a difference between henny young using a violin and yehudi menuhin using the same violin. Using the source materials just means using the same source materials. I use the same alphabet as Jackie Collins or Kahlil Gibran, and no one mistakes me for them.