179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
david turgeon
To:
Matthew Allen
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 05 Aug 1999 14:17:13 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) another oneliner
Msg-Id:
<37A9D529.880C578A@evolutiontech.com>
Mbox:
idm.9908.gz
quoted 5 lines Actually the point is interesting. If the tenant of Post-modernism is, that> Actually the point is interesting. If the tenant of Post-modernism is, that > at its very core, a movement that isnt a movement. An idea where any thing, > any idea, is valid (be it baroque architecture with killer robots instead of > finely crafted saints in the wood walls, or big toilets made out of plastic > and filled with styrofoam).
validity is one thing, but will people use them? like them? i personally like my toilet without styrofoam.
quoted 4 lines I Sorta see the pendulum swinging back really> I Sorta see the pendulum swinging back really > quite far the other way. To some sort of uber-modernism. Something were > rules are created and very stricly adhered to. Like if your doing an Electro > track you have to use very specific sounds and a very recognizable beat.
people do that, & did that since the inception of techno. people did that since the beginnings of religion & organized life. should that really be defined as modernism, be it uber?
quoted 2 lines Or we'll all just keep doing whatever the hell we so desire and> Or we'll all just keep doing whatever the hell we so desire and > postmodernism will never die.
that doesn't seem to be the direction we're headed to. or maybe by metamodernism you meant that some would follow modernist ways & some postmodernist ones, but all the while _knowing_ that one isn't better than the other & that both have good & bad sides. so the next step would be knowing that you're knowing, & that whether you know or not doesn't make a difference? how far can we go with that? -- david