179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Matthew Allen
To:
'david turgeon'
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 5 Aug 1999 11:04:54 -0700
Subject:
RE: (idm) another oneliner
Msg-Id:
<A4616F893E30D11199CD0000C0618AE5FB8BF7@mailserver.lith.com>
Mbox:
idm.9908.gz
As a smart ass remark... Actually the point is interesting. If the tenant of Post-modernism is, that at its very core, a movement that isnt a movement. An idea where any thing, any idea, is valid (be it baroque architecture with killer robots instead of finely crafted saints in the wood walls, or big toilets made out of plastic and filled with styrofoam). I Sorta see the pendulum swinging back really quite far the other way. To some sort of uber-modernism. Something were rules are created and very stricly adhered to. Like if your doing an Electro track you have to use very specific sounds and a very recognizable beat. Or we'll all just keep doing whatever the hell we so desire and postmodernism will never die. m. -----Original Message----- From: david turgeon [mailto:david@evolutiontech.com] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 10:57 AM To: Matthew Allen Cc: idm@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (idm) another oneliner
quoted 1 line meta-modernism> meta-modernism
i can sort of see where you're getting at, but just to make sure, how do you define that? -- david