ninphil wrote:
quoted 18 lines Well, I guess the point is keeping it interesting for them is not>
> >Well, I guess the point is keeping it interesting for them is not
> > necessarily the same as keeping us involved... for a band to be that
> > disregarding of the desires of their audience is pretty off-putting,
> > if you ask me. But it just goes to show why a live techno act is not
> > treated the same as a live band. At any rate, it's not that I want my
> > needs pandered to per se, I'd just like to be given some respect as a
> > fan and be met 50/50. When they do what they do live, it's more like
> > 95/5. And yes it may be
> I don't get this complaint...you own the records rght? So you can listen
> to those any day...personally watching a show of stuff I've never heard
> before is more interesting...not less..."keeping it interesting for
> themselves"...that's the best sign . Any artist that persues their own
> vision and invites a live audience along with them is fine by me. Don't
> be scared...live bands that jam and never play a song the same way once
> are the ones who are famous for their live sets...not old wankers who
> cane the same old hits the same old way..
> xxxoooo
'cept for the Rolling Stones...