179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:28:10 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) "authorship" vs. "credibility"/ questions
Msg-Id:
<970930012806_1823578219@emout02.mail.aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.9709.gz
In a message dated 97-09-30 00:36:30 EDT, you write: << the year. still doesn't address why this "mainstream" vs. "underground" thread keeps popping up, which i think has more to do with the kids trying to establish a pecking order than any real desire to discuss idm or music in general. >> I figure we can expect the "mainstream" vs. "underground" arguement to pop again when the nin album is released. I really don't mind a lot of the arguements and debates that appear on the list---- there can be some good stuff to learn from these things. But the "evil mainstream" vs "the poor, innocent underground" is very boring and it has no resolution. Oh well Anyways, does anybody have a transcript of "the wire"'s review of the rdj album?? Also, can anybody tell me what gong albums are worth purchasing after the trilogy albums?? THANKS